Steelconcept
Steel lateral systems: moment frame, braced frame, EBF, shear wall
One-line orientation
Steel buildings resist wind and earthquake forces with moment frames, braced frames, shear walls or cores, and sometimes staggered trusses. Compare them by stiffness, ductility, cost, and how much they obstruct the plan.
Key points
- Moment-resisting frame: uses designated beams, columns, and moment connections in the
lateral-force-resisting frame. Other joints in the building may be simple connections.
- Pros: architecturally open bays (no diagonals), flexible planning.
- Cons: uses more steel; costly and labor-intensive (many moment connections).
- (Concentrically) braced frame: diagonal bracing in selected bays.
- Pros: stiff and efficient; removes the need for moment connections across the whole frame.
- Cons: braces obstruct openings in the braced bays; limited to those bays.
- Eccentrically braced frame (EBF): brace deliberately offset from the joint creates a short
link beam that yields ductilely.
- Pros: resists lateral seismic force without buckling the braces; good energy absorption / ductility for earthquake zones.
- Cons: more complex than a standard braced frame.
- Shear wall / braced core: solid wall (often concrete) or braced core acting as a deep
vertical cantilever.
- Pros: very effective for high-rise rigidity; typically one per axis to brace both directions.
- Staggered truss system: story-deep trusses on alternating floors, each carrying the floor
above.
- Pros: maximizes usable floor area and distributes loads efficiently.
Steel lateral systems — two-story bay elevations
Same frame and side load; only the stabilizing element changes
View diagram Hide diagram
Scroll horizontally to explore
- rigid joint
- pinned joint
A fifth system, the staggered truss, uses story-deep trusses on alternating floors — it maximizes clear floor space and is not drawn here.
Confusions / comparison
| System | How it resists lateral load | Stiffness / ductility | Architectural impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moment frame | Rigid moment joints | Ductile; less stiff; most steel | Open bays, no diagonals |
| Concentrically braced frame | Diagonal braces at joints | Stiff, efficient; less ductile | Braces obstruct openings |
| Eccentrically braced frame (EBF) | Braces + yielding link beam | Stiff + ductile (seismic) | Braces present; some openness via link bay |
| Shear wall / core | Solid wall / braced core | Very stiff/rigid | Wall occupies the plane; great for high-rise |
| Staggered truss | Story-deep trusses, alternating floors | Efficient load distribution | Maximizes clear floor space |
Related
→ Steel connections (this module): moment connections enable moment frames; bolted braces build braced frames · Steel shapes and members (this module): the W-shapes, HSS braces, and trusses used · Steel types and production (this module): ductility (low-carbon steel) underpins seismic performance.
Spotted an issue with this card? Tell us →
Related units
ratings update your review schedule ·
Round complete